June 30, 2005

Dear Colleagues...

Monday's Supreme Court decision on NCTA v. Brand X will change the face of the Internet and marks a radical break from America's historic foundations. From the age of the telegraph, bedrock principles founded on competition, universal access and the free flow of information gave rise to flourishing communication systems, including the birth of the open Internet. Monday's decision may signal its death

 The 6-3 ruling reaffirmed the FCC's earlier contested decision exempting cable companies from common carriage laws. This unfortunate decision allows cable companies to close their wires to competitive services. In addition to creating monopolies and prohibitive costs for the average consumer, Monday's ruling may allow cable companies to control access to Internet content. As a direct result, what was thought to be an open market place of ideas may soon fragment into multiple walled gardens zealously guarded by big cable companies.

By choosing to protect Internet gatekeepers instead of consumers, the U.S. is moving in exactly the opposite direction from its technologically advanced competitors, such as Japan, Korea and Sweden. A recent International Telecommunication Union study ranked the U.S. 16th in broadband Internet penetration, down from No. 3 five years ago. Monday's decision will only make matters worse by allowing cable companies to close their networks to healthy competition, and ignore low income urban and rural neighborhoods.

Instead, Congress should be considering network neutrality rules that keeps the wires open, encourages free-flowing information, and expands access to all Americans-which in turn will make the U.S. competitive internationally. Congress must pass legislation that protects the open infrastructure of the Internet and ensures network neutrality based on nondiscriminatory access for all. The American public demands it, and it is incumbent upon us to keep the Internet open, affordable, and accessible.

Posted by wbia at 02:55:53 | Permanent Link | Comments (0) |

June 21, 2005

Dial-up continues to lose ground

Last year, 36 million American homes, or 52% of all households with Internet access, used dial-up services. That percentage is expected to drop to 40% at the end of this year. At the same time, cable and phone companies are expected to add 8 million broadband subscribers
this year, bringing their total to 38.7 million. New York Times

Posted by wbia at 15:15:15 | Permanent Link | Comments (0) |

E-rate Overhaul

Looking to stem the reported waste, fraud, and abuse that has plagued the eRate--the $2.25 billion-a-year federal program that provides telecommunications discounts to eligible schools and libraries--the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) on June 14 said it would seek public feedback regarding its management, administration, and oversight of the Universal Service Fund (USF), the federal coffer from which the eRate draws its money. FCC: News Release NPRM 

FCC officials are exploring ways to simplify the process by which schools apply for and receive eRate funds. Among the potential changes the commission, which currently consists of two Democrats and two Republican members, is considering: A new management structure that would enable schools to apply for multi-year funding commitments on telecommunications services, rather than reapplying for the same services year after year, as is now the case.

Source: eSchool News

Posted by wbia at 14:48:02 | Permanent Link | Comments (1) |

June 10, 2005

A Yahoo - Skype deal?

Om Malik reports today of some talk about Yahoo and Skype doing some business. Stay tuned for more as this develops. The initial report of this comes from a French blog of Jean-Michel. By the way, it's in French.
Posted by wbia at 14:24:38 | Permanent Link | Comments (0) |

June 09, 2005

CPUC fighting for the Bells?

What is with people thinking that the Bells have been impeded in their build out of Broadband? The following is a quote from the National Journal of Susan Kennedy crying for the poor poor Bells... National Journal
 
Susan Kennedy, a member of the California Public Utilities Commission, declared, "Franchising is single biggest barrier to opening up investment in these new technologies" – a reference to broadband and other services available though high-speed Internet networks.
 
From the CPUC website comment section; "The CPUC does NOT have jurisdiction over federal surcharges or taxes, city/county imposed taxes, interstate (with exception of slamming) or international matters, municipal utilities, cable TV rates & services, propane rates, cellular rates, telephone equipment, payphone service, directory advertising, paging companies, or Internet Service Providers.
 
Kennedy said that telecommunications companies were eager to invest in advanced Internet-based networks.
 
"These companies are dying to spend money," she said. But, she contended, they are being held back by regulatory impediments, with "the franchising issue being the single most important barrier to some kind of a comparative offering to the cable company."
 
The reason, Kennedy said, is that consumers are not going to switch from cable TV to a Bell company or another telecommunications provider -- even one with a super-fast fiber-optic connection -- unless that firm is able to offer television along with Internet data.
 
The Bells sat back for years fat and sassy watching Cable invest billions of dollars and now crying that it will cost too much to do the things they want to do. Oh, yeah they may say this is due to the mandate that President Bush wants of everyone to have Broadband by 2007... Well, that is too damm bad, pony up the cash and play the game by the rules that are in place. Or what, they are going to CASTRATE the Cable CO's like they (Bells) have done to the ISPs and others?
 
Come on Susan, what is your real motive here?
Posted by wbia at 14:05:17 | Permanent Link | Comments (0) |

Cables preemptive strike

The cable industry upped the ante on telecommunications reform by urging lawmakers to lift rate restrictions on cable pricing – and to apply the same regulations for all video services, whether offered by cable operators or Bell companies. The recommendations, unveiled by National Cable and Telecommunications Association President Kyle McSlarrow in a speech in Washington, appear to signal a strategy shift for the cable industry -- which until now has pushed for the Bells' programming arms to be regulated under rules that apply to cable today. National Journal
Posted by wbia at 13:22:52 | Permanent Link | Comments (0) |

Video Wars - Bells launch Counter Attack

CHICAGO –The heads of SBC Communications, Verizon Communications and BellSouth -- during appearances at this week's SuperComm telecom conference -- said they are prepared to mount a legislative counterattack to what they characterized as cable industry efforts to thwart their entry into the pay-television market. And an SBC executive contended that Congress must aggressively regulate the rates that the cable industry charges for subscription video programming -- or allow the Bell companies to compete. National Journal

Posted by wbia at 13:20:34 | Permanent Link | Comments (0) |