Small Internet Firms Look To Consumers In Telecom Fight
From National Journal's Technology Daily Feb. 24
Randy Barrett
Small Internet service providers (ISPs) are gearing up for the fight over an expected rewrite of the 1996 Telecommunications Act without a war chest or even a lobbyist. Instead, they pin their hopes on a grassroots battle royale."This is as pure a grassroots movement as you will see," said Cynthia De Lorenzi, co-founder of the Washington Bureau for ISP Advocacy (WBIA), which has 150 members.
The WBIA came into existence last fall to paper the FCC with hundreds of comments from ISPs and their customers against an effort by dominant telecom carriers to loosen federal regulations on sharing telecom networks. Small ISP owners are feisty, headstrong and fiercely independent, but they insist they can overcome their differences and work cooperatively as Congress decides the future of their industry.
"In the end, we all have to eat," said Paul Rice, interim executive director of the Federation of Internet Solutions Providers of the Americas (FISPA), which represents ISPs. Dominant telecom firms like Verizon Communications and cable companies have significant resources to fight for their interests on Capitol Hill. In the 2004 election cycle, telephone industry political action committees (PACs) gave $6.4 million to Republican and Democratic candidates. Cable industry PACs donated $2 million. The companies also employ fleets of lobbyists to press their cases before key players.
Small ISPs, however, are just trying to stay alive, industry officials said. "It's never been worse," said Kate Lynch, president of the National Internet Alliance (NIA). "People are going out of business at a fast rate." NIA was founded last summer and counts among its members the leading regional ISP associations. It has no lobbying staff and no budget. "The lack
of funds is a huge problem," Lynch said.
But ISPs can play off consumer ire, said Mark Uncapher, counsel for the Information Technology Association of America, which supports the existence of a robust, independent ISP industry.
When consumers realize that Congress could decide what programming they see, based on the Internet provider they can access, the dynamic will change dramatically, he said. "That's when the folks back home trump inside-the-Beltway lobbying."
Regional ISP associations are beginning to talk to one another about pooling resources and focusing their lobbying. FISPA is in discussions with unnamed groups, Rice said. And De Lorenzi said she is working to build a coalition. "We need not only money, we need people to take the time to share their expertise," she said.
EarthLink, one of the largest independent ISPs, also is working to build a lobbying coalition. "You will see the independent ISP industry speak with a much clearer and coherent voice," predicted David Baker, EarthLink's vice president for law and public policy.
Other established trade associations also are joining ranks with the ISPs as their interests coincide on the telecom rewrite. Among them is CompTel/ASCENT, which primarily represents local competitors to the Bells.
"They're a tenacious lot," CompTel/ASCENT lobbyist Mary Albert said of the ISPs. "They're pretty effective at getting their customers riled up."
Recent Comments